Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers
WebNov 6, 2024 · As observed by Hon‟ble Supreme Court, in the case of CIT Vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers [(2003) 259 ITR 449 (SC)], “A construction which reduces the statute to a futility has to be avoided. A statute or any enacting provision therein must be so construed as to make it effective and operative on the principle expressed in maxim us res magi’s ... WebDec 17, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers Arijit Pasayat, J.— A question of seminal importance relating to the period for which interest in terms of Section 234-B of the …
Cit vs hindustan bulk carriers
Did you know?
Webof Income Tax vs. Hindustan Bulk Carrier, the application can be seen in several landmark judgements before that, both pre – independence and post – independence. Several judgements have applied these principles implicitly and the same is reflected in their interpretation of legislations while adjudicating disputes. 1. Venkataramana Devaru v. WebCIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2003)3 SCC 57 the Supreme Court laid down five principles of rule of harmonious construction:- The courts must avoid a head-on clash of …
WebAug 15, 2015 · Sathe has appeared in a number of landmark matters in the Supreme Court and the High Courts such as CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2002) 258 ITR 399 (SC), CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd (1989) 179 ITR 54 (Bom), CIT vs. LIC Housing Finance Ltd (2014) 367 ITR 458 (Bom) etc. He was designated Senior Advocate on 23.07.2005 and was …
WebOct 11, 2024 · CIT vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers … but can waive or reduce interest u/s 220(2A) if prescribed conditions are satisfied. Rectification of order: section 245D(6B): Within a period of 6 months from the end of month in which order was passed; WebIn fact, in the facts of the appellant's case, the decision of Apex Court is squarely applicable wherein no uncertain term the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers {(259 ITR 449) (SC)} have held that "on the portion of income determined by the Commission not disclosed to the A.O., interest is to be charged u/s ...
WebJun 25, 2024 · The Supreme Court laid down following rules of harmonious construction in the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers [7] :- The courts must avoid a head on clash of seemingly contradicting provisions and they must construe the contradictory provisions so as to harmonize them
WebJan 16, 2024 · The reference by the AO to the case of Hindustan Bulk Carriers (supra) is misplaced since in that case block assessment was not involved. In any case this decision was disapproved by a five member bench in the case of Brij Lal v CIT 194 Taxman 566 (SC). In Brij Lal (supra) section 234A, 234B and 234C were held to be applicable to … how to restrict linkedin accountWebJun 28, 2012 · That is clearly an absurdity. As to what should be done in such a situation, we find guidance from the observations made by Honble Supreme Court, in the case CIT vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers Ltd (259 ITR 449), as follows: … how to restrict open id configuration pageWebThe Ld.Senior Counsel referring to the provisions of section 153A and the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers 259 ITR 449 (SC) submitted that the provisions of one section of the statute cannot be used to defeat those of another unless it is impossible to effect resilient between them. Thus, a ... how to restrict participants in teams meetingWebDec 17, 2000 · Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Hindustan Bulk Carriers on 17 December, 2000 Author: Dharmadhikari Bench: D.M. Dharmadhikari. CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 7966-67 of 1996 PETITIONER: Commissioner of Income Tax RESPONDENT: M/s … northeastern opt extensionWebDec 17, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers Arijit Pasayat, J.— A question of seminal importance relating to the period for which interest in terms of Section 234-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) can be levied when the Settlement Commission (in short “the Commission”) passes an order under Section 245-D of the Act, is the subject-matter ... how to restrict number input in htmlWebJun 25, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers:- The courts must avoid a head on clash of seemingly contradicting provisions and they must construe the contradictory provisions … northeastern oral surgery kingston paWebJun 2, 2011 · The Hon’ble Supreme Court had in the case of CIT vs. Damani Brothers 259 ITR 475 and CIT vs. Hindustan Bulk Carriers 259 ITR 449 held that interest u/ss. 234A, 234B and 234C is mandatory and the Settlement Commission had no power to reduce or waive such interest. In view of these decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court which were … northeastern operating engineers